BREAKING: Sources confirm the US House and Senate now have the VOTES to pass the bipartisan NATO Unity Protection Act, explicitly BLOCKING President Trump from using force to seize Greenland—a Danish territory under NATO protection

Washington — Sources say both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate now have enough votes to pass the bipartisan NATO Unity Protection Act, legislation aimed at explicitly preventing President Donald Trump from using military or coercive force to seize Greenland, a Danish territory protected under the NATO alliance.

The bill, introduced by Senators Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat, and Lisa Murkowski, a Republican, would bar the use of Department of Defense and State Department funds for any blockade, occupation, or annexation of territory belonging to a NATO member or its recognized regions. Supporters say the measure is intentionally clear, reinforcing Congress’s authority and the United States’ long-standing commitment to alliance unity.

The move comes amid growing concern on Capitol Hill over President Trump’s repeated assertions that U.S. control of Greenland is strategically necessary to counter Russia and China’s expanding presence in the Arctic. Those remarks have strained diplomatic relations with Denmark and raised alarms among European allies, who warn that such rhetoric risks undermining NATO’s core principle of collective defense.

Lawmakers backing the legislation describe it as a preventive safeguard rather than a reactionary step. According to senior congressional aides familiar with the discussions, bipartisan support has solidified in recent weeks as members from both parties expressed concern that any use of force against NATO territory could trigger a severe alliance crisis and weaken U.S. credibility abroad.

Senator Shaheen said the bill sends a clear signal that disputes among allies must be resolved through diplomacy and respect for sovereignty, not threats. Senator Murkowski emphasized that Arctic security depends on cooperation with allies, warning that coercive actions would only serve the interests of geopolitical rivals.

In the House, leadership sources say momentum behind the bill continues to grow, with lawmakers citing intelligence and defense assessments showing how internal divisions within NATO could be exploited by adversaries. Several members described the legislation as a critical guardrail against actions that could shatter the alliance at a time of heightened global instability.

If enacted, the NATO Unity Protection Act would represent one of the most direct congressional efforts in recent years to limit executive authority when it comes to allied sovereignty. Legal experts note that restricting funding would effectively prevent any administration from pursuing military or diplomatic actions aimed at pressuring or annexing NATO territory.

As debate over Greenland’s strategic importance continues, supporters say passage of the bill would send a firm message to allies and adversaries alike: NATO territory is not negotiable, alliance unity is essential, and U.S. commitments will be upheld through both policy and law.